Recent searches
Search options
Omar Two Tone
@yianiris
could you please share it with us but in a way we can see what it is about,? cause login is required. 
@yianiris @heretical_i
yes it's fixed, and here's my opinion:
I've experienced once the deletion of a post which was about vaccines a long time ago, it was from a claiming from a user of another instance I'm on. I get the point that in all servers there are rules by owners, some more permissive than others, the respect is the only and common one. also I've observed that many users here have leftist points of view in many topics, when was the US elections, mastodon was insoportable, but I know it's impossible all people have my way of thinking. even though I don't think it is a complete social engineering experiment because we have the choice of being an owner running our instance or changing to another one with the minimum premise of respect. I've not tried diaspora yet, but certainly I've considered other spaces like the social media "minds" which is also federated where I post even more sensitive things than here in mastodon.
About the 'respect' thing... kafeneio.social gets it right. @omartwotone @yianiris
@heretical_i @yianiris 
and what about if the admin or a moderator feels extremely insulted just by a complete opposite post or opinion, (that's a point on the original post from diaspora)... should they deliberately delete or ban accounts just for being the owner of the instance? should everyone and each one be an owner to avoid censorship?
Ownership of a server means that it is much easier and tolerated to delete content and/or the author than debate over a topic. This is why #fediverse appears more intolerant to difference than commercial services who only care about doing a job.
If the model worked we would see more servers and more people, what we see on stats is more servers going off the air than new ones. No attempt to organize and set rules beyond "private ownership".
The reason server go down may just be because people were playing and experimenting with mastodon sw too. You make a lot of assumptions. Including the less tolerance @yianiris One thing that's true no matter the size of the server or mods, if you badger them you're history. If they don't want or be cut off from the rest of the fediverse b/c outside views on, lets say vaccines, its their server. Find another one for that discussion.
@omartwotone
Vaccines in specific is something I stayed away from, not all vaccines are good/bad and everyone should make an educated choice on one.
You are also making the assumption that servers going down at such high rate is because of experimentation. All I see is a steady decline, when all advocates keep saying get your own server
Having your own server won't do you any good if you're talking to the bitbucket b/c you've been blocked by most instances, if thats what you want. Like having a blogspot blog no one visits. Free speech everywhere is related to the recipient more than the person exercising the right. You can have all you want, but that doesnt mean anyone will listen. @yianiris @omartwotone
Nearly exactly, most respond with "get your own server" to solve your individual problem, when the problem is collective it is not an individual one.
Because of what you explain, expression and communication in fediverse is under the boot of "individual ownership" and discretion. Skewed and distorted just as a pseudo democracy is.
HOW can there be a collective body/agreement to end this dictatorial rule of the "majority"
In real/material life, space, land, water is public and contains human rights. The problem we have here is that there is not an inch left of being public and if you feel discomfort as a guest go buy your own land and do as you like. Even at the risk of being excluded by the club of other owners.
In other words, I am not talking about my problem (you are suggesting how to solve it), I am talking of a general collective problem we have.